There have been some challenges aided by the Frequency vs. Satisfaction research.
The test from where the info was drawn included mainly white lesbians (77%), leading to a pool that is racially homogenous of participants. Another nervous about the sample ended up being the disproportionate representation that is geographic. Although eighty-four % associated with the U.S. urban centers are represented when you look at the Frequency vs. Satisfaction Survey with one or more respondent from each state, most of the test (61%) is through the researcher’s house state, Indiana. The instability in geographical representation may overemphasize the attitudes, opinions, and emotions of lesbians when you look at the Midwest, that will be commonly considered to be more conservative. This bias that is geographic skew the study outcomes.
Another concern in regards to the sampling procedure results through the method that is outreach. Since the research had been carried out with a psychotherapist whom focuses on the proper care of lesbian individuals and partners, the study outreach might have included a disproportionate quantity of lesbians that are in treatment. And also this has got the possible to bias the survey outcomes, let’s assume that lesbians in treatment might present with additional issues about their relationship than lesbians maybe not in guidance.
A concern that is third the analysis pertains to making use of self-report to collect information. In a few situations, lesbians had been expected to depend on their memory of a relationship that has been ended as much as 6 months ago. The more level of recall that’s needed is, the higher margin of mistake there is certainly within the findings that are ultimate. Also, lesbians who had been recounting their experiences of a relationship that is prior have biased perception of this relationship according to just just how it finished. If the connection finished badly, they might experience negative recall, which may influence their ideas about relationship satisfaction, and even their feelings concerning the regularity of sex along with other factors explored within the Frequency vs. Satisfaction Survey.
Areas identified for future research
A few extra concerns surfaced while researching the main topics intimate regularity since it correlates with relationship satisfaction. Among the findings into the Frequency vs. Satisfaction Survey, in addition to Lever’s Survey (1995), implies that in spite of how much intercourse lesbians are receiving, they often report the desire to get more. This specific dichotomy of infrequent intercourse by lesbians who state a wish for more is apparently in the centre of this lesbian intimate dilemma. Further research may show helpful in responding to this concern: what exactly is preventing lesbians whom report a desire for lots more regular intercourse from having more intercourse?
Another question that is unanswered surfaced with this research is, “How does observed relationship protection influence intimate regularity in lesbian relationships?” It is not a subject that has been addressed into the Frequency vs. Satisfaction Survey, neither is it an interest that this researcher discovered inside her research. Nevertheless, it appears that relationship protection, or higher especially, the impression of safety that one’s relationship is strong and stable, is apparently a valuable characteristic to lesbians, and something that is sustained by a very good connection that is emotional. This researcher theorizes the chance that the sensed relationship safety for a couple that is lesbian the reduced the price of sexual regularity.
Areas of great interest for further research relate solely to the universality of lesbian frequency that is sexual. Just how do prices of lesbian frequency that is sexual the United States compare to many other nations, especially in more modern nations that offer legal rights and defenses for lesbian relationships? Can there be an influence that is cultural and on occasion even a geographic impact, on intimate regularity among lesbians? Maybe a scholarly research comparing lesbians from chosen bigger urban centers such as for instance new york, nyc and l . a ., Ca could possibly be in comparison to lesbians from smaller metropolitan areas into the Midwest such as for example Indianapolis, Indiana and Columbus, Ohio. The correlation of competition and frequency that is sexual lesbians can be a valuable topic to explore.
This worker concludes that the alternative in the pursuit of greater understanding about lesbian sex would be most readily useful accomplished through qualitative research.
Probably the most accurate image of lesbian sex will probably require an in depth, longitudinal, qualitative research that tracks the nuances and characteristics of the lesbian couple’s relationship through the initial phases of courtship through the entire span of their relationship. This could provide for brand new information to area which have maybe perhaps not yet been hypothesized, as well as for lesbians to offer vocals with their experiences since they are occurring, as opposed to the nature that is subjective in recalling the events of one’s relationship.
What’s many clear to the researcher is the fact that sex between females is uniquely lesbian and without contrast. When juxtaposed with heterosexual or male that is gay, lesbian sex has gone out of focus, mexican female order brides blurred with what is recognized to be “normal” when in fact, lesbian sexuality does not have any founded standard behavior of their very very own. As research continues on lesbian sex without preconceived notions exactly how it “should” appearance or exactly just exactly what it “should” entail, intriguing and crucial discoveries will probably be produced. Eventually, lesbian sex has already been valuable in its very very own suitable for a unique nuances. Unfortuitously, it’s not yet well recognized. Over time, lesbians will undoubtedly be prepared to determine their very own health that is sexual greater knowledge of lesbian sex all together, so when that occurs, needed progress could have been made.